Campaigns that are run by those with questionable integrity, a failed ideology and limited organisational capacity invariably come off the rails.
Today we sensationally reveal that the main proposition from Team Holmes – that his own Branch in Kirklees has a density of 85% - is a complete and utter fabrication.
Holmes and his loyal supporters suggest that under his “radical left” leadership the Kirklees Branch has achieved the highest density of any Branch in the whole of the union.
But today a contributor to this blog has provided absolute and unquestionable evidence that the true density is in fact 58%. Of some 14,689 council employees the branch has in membership 8550.
Not only is 58% well below the density achieved by the best performing branches but it is below the density in some of those neighbouring branches to Kirklees.
Holmes must now come clean on whether the claims – which have so far been the foundation of his campaign – have simply been made in error or whether he has intentionally sought to mislead people. Either way this news will come as a devastating blow to Holmes.
A rudimentary error of this magnitude must surely cause even the most hard-line loyalist to question whether Holmes has the ability to lead the union. How could anyone have any confidence in his ability to lead a major organisation such as UNISON when even the most basic calculations appear beyond his intellect?
Of course, we do understand that many will think that such a mistake could not be made and that the whole density claims are a charade, designed to mislead in the forlorn hope of adding some credibility to a faltering campaign.
Holmes must come clear – is it a cock up or is it conspiracy?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If that's true it's a bloody disgrace.
ReplyDeleteSo all he's got to his campaign would be getting a special conference called that cost a fortune and achieved precisely nothing.
Hmmm - he seems to pop up everywhere except when he's called to account!
ReplyDeleteOops, looks like someone on this blog should re-sit their Maths GCSE! http://jonrogers1963.blogspot.com/2010/02/numeracy-hour-for-negative-campaigners.html
ReplyDeleteWill Paul get an apology? Becuase who ever wrote this either "intentionally sought to mislead people" or has no idea about union density in Local Government.
ReplyDeleteFor those who do not understand LG density, you need to remove from the figure of employees, Teachers and Craft Workers, as we have no bargaining rights for those employees....oops
Maybe Carol and Teehee should read the most recent story.....
ReplyDelete